Cooper Hackett

Physical Profile

Listed between 6-foot-7, 250 pounds and 6-foot-7, 270 pounds across services with an 80-inch wingspan — prototypical blindside tackle length that cannot be coached. His height-to-weight ratio indicates a frame still 30-50 pounds from a college playing weight, which is actually a positive developmental indicator at this stage: he projects to carry 300+ pounds without losing the movement skills that drew national attention. Evaluators have consistently cited his combination of size, athleticism, and mobility as rare for the class. The one physical red flag is the surgically repaired shoulder — labrum injuries for offensive linemen directly affect punch strength and sustain ability, so his post-rehab strength testing will be the single most important data point in his re-evaluation.

Play Style

Junior film and evaluation reports paint a long-armed tackle who wins with reach and easy movement rather than raw mass — he engulfs smaller high school defenders, moves fluidly for a near-6-foot-8 frame, and flashes the lateral quickness to mirror in pass protection. As with most small-school linemen with his dimensions, he plays tall at times and can rely on being simply bigger than his competition, so his pad level and hand timing are projection points rather than proven traits. The scouting book on him is fundamentally incomplete: with no senior season coming, his junior tape and camp circuit work constitute the entire evaluation, which is exactly why the services have diverged so sharply (247Sports No. 115 vs. Rivals five-star No. 32).

Strengths

• Elite, un-coachable length — 6-foot-7 with an 80-inch wingspan gives him the reach to control edge rushers before they engage his frame, the trait that made him a consensus top-10 national prospect (No. 9-10 overall, No. 1-3 OT on 247Sports Composite) before the injury
• Movement skills well above the positional norm for his size — reports from his junior evaluation cycle consistently highlight mobility and athleticism, suggesting he can execute reach blocks, climb to the second level, and pull in wide-zone schemes rather than being limited to gap/power
• Ranked the No. 1 player in the state of Oklahoma and was the face of OU's 2027 class — he chose the Sooners over other offers (reportedly taking less NIL money in the flip from Texas Tech), which speaks to conviction in fit and development over short-term payout

Areas to Improve

• Medical/durability profile — the torn labrum reportedly bothered him since his freshman year and the corrective surgery wipes out his entire senior season, meaning he arrives in Norman with no senior film, a rehab timeline, and a shoulder that must prove it holds up under college contact
• Mass and functional strength — at 250-270 pounds he needs a full college strength cycle (or two) to handle SEC edge power, and the lost senior year removes a season of live-rep strength development against competition
• Competition-level translation — Fort Gibson is a small-school Oklahoma program, so his technique (hand placement, pass-set depth, leverage at 6-foot-7) has not been stress-tested against Division I-caliber rushers; camp settings had been where he proved himself, and he now loses a year of that exposure

College Projection

Plan on a true developmental timeline at Oklahoma: a redshirt year in 2027 dedicated to completing shoulder rehab, adding 30+ pounds, and rebuilding technique after a year away from live football. Realistic competition for a two-deep role comes in year two, with a starting opportunity at tackle in years three or four. If the shoulder checks out and his pre-injury athleticism returns intact, his ceiling remains that of a multi-year SEC starting left tackle — the frame and movement profile that earned the original five-star grade don't disappear with a re-rank. The floor, if strength development stalls post-surgery, is a swing tackle or a kick inside to guard where his length still plays.

NFL Outlook

The raw materials — 6-foot-7, 80-inch wingspan, plus athleticism — are the exact prototype NFL teams draft on traits in the first two rounds, and his pre-injury consensus (top-10 national, No. 1-3 OT) reflected legitimate first-round-caliber upside. That outlook is now genuinely wide-variance: he must prove the shoulder holds up, restack a year of lost development, and demonstrate his junior-year athleticism survived surgery. If he starts two-plus healthy seasons at tackle for Oklahoma, he re-enters day-one/day-two draft conversations; the medical file will follow him to the combine regardless.

Best Fit

Oklahoma is a defensible landing spot precisely because his profile demands what a resourced SEC program offers: an elite sports-medicine and strength staff to manage the shoulder rehab and mass-building, and a coaching staff with no incentive to rush him onto the field. Schematically he fits best in an offense that uses wide-zone and movement blocking to leverage his mobility while his anchor develops, rather than a phone-booth power scheme that would expose his current strength deficit. Any program evaluating him should be underwriting a patient three-year development plan built around the medical, not a plug-and-play tackle.