SEC Recruiting Class Grades

AI-analyzed recruiting class evaluations with position-by-position breakdowns

« Back to Class Rankings
University of Missouri

University of Missouri

Class of 2025 Recruiting Analysis

B+
Overall Score: 88
B+
Offense
B+
Defense
N/A
Special Teams
88
Overall Score

Position Grades

A
ATH (2)
A
EDGE (2)
A
QB (2)
B
WR (6)
A
OT (2)
A-
RB (4)
A-
CB (2)
B+
LB (2)
B-
IOL (4)
C
DL (2)
C
TE (2)

Strengths

WR depth (6), RB depth (4), IOL depth (4)

Areas to Address

None significant

Needs Addressed
No specific needs filled
Remaining Needs
None

Full Analysis

Missouri has assembled a solid, depth-heavy recruiting class that should help them compete in the middle tier of the SEC, though it lacks the elite talent typically needed to challenge the conference's top programs. With an 88/100 overall score and 22 four-star recruits in a 30-player class, the Tigers have prioritized quality over star-chasing, building a foundation of reliable contributors rather than seeking transformational talents. The absence of any five-star recruits puts them at a disadvantage compared to SEC powerhouses, but the high percentage of four-star players (73%) suggests strong evaluation and development potential. The headliners of this class address several key areas, led by edge rusher Javion Hilson (#46 nationally), who should provide immediate pass-rush help in the competitive SEC. Quarterback Matt Zollers (#93) represents a crucial investment in the program's future, while receiver Donovan Olugbode (#95) adds to what appears to be an impressive group of pass-catchers. Offensive tackle Jack Lange (#135) and running back Marquise Davis (#162) round out the top-tier additions, suggesting Missouri is building around offensive playmakers and protecting them with quality line play. However, the lack of identified unfilled needs, while positive for roster construction, may indicate the class lacks game-changing impact players who could elevate the program's ceiling in a talent-rich conference where elite recruits often make the difference between competing and contending.

Report generated: Jan 14, 2026